Projects
days until the end of spring semester.days until Snakes on a Plane.
Boxes unpacked
Math article project
Finished mathematical core of article. Next: Write analytical core of article.
Dummit and Foote, Abstract Algebra
Finished section 1.6 (86 to go)
Silverman and Tate, Rational Points on Elliptic Curves
FInished 2.5 (31 to go)
Conway, Functions of One Complex Variable I
Finished section 7.5 (27 to go)
Munkres, Topology
Finished section 21 (60 to go)
Royden, Real Analysis
Finished section 2.4 (97 to go)
Nonfiction book project
Todo list uptodate
Fiction book project
1443 out of 100,000 projected words written.
Top 100 novels of all time
Reading Ulysses
IMDB top 250 films
Tengoku to jigoku next in queue.
Blogroll
This academic life
Academic CoachConfessions of a Community College Dean
Learning Curves
The Little Professor
My Hiding Place
New Kid on the Hallway
One Bright Star
Planned Obsolescence
Tall, Dark, and Mysterious
Math blogs
Ars MathematicaMathForge
MathPuzzle
Think Again
Archives

July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
December 2004
January 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
Vito Prosciutto: Teaching community college math on the road to a PhD.
Tuesday, September 28, 2004
19:30Mean Girls
I have to admit that when the question came up on the screen when I was watching the movie, I was trying to solve the problem.
What's distressing is how many of the commenters on this post got the math wrong.
As a math geek, I see a limit of a rational expression, and my first thought is L'Hopital's rule. Since the numerator and denominator are both 0 at x=0, we can find the limit by taking the derivative of the numerator and denominator. Lot's of important special derivatives to employ, plus the chain rule. Where some people go wrong is that when they get to this stage, and get the limit of the numerator as 2 and the limit of the denominator as 0, they do another derivative. This is only valid if the numerator and denominator are both 0 (or both infinity). Once we've done the first derivatives, we're done.
Prehaps more interesting is NPCurmudgeon's solution where he rewrites the function using series expansions and arrives at the solution quickly and elegantly.
On a vaguely related note, I found myself contemplating some function that was described by my Calc teacher in high school as being unintegrable (in that there wasn't any simply defined function for which g'(x)=f(x)). I had one of those moments of inspiration where I realized that this could probably be dealt with through taylor expansions. You'd end up with a nasty looking infinite series, but it would at least allow for easier estimations of the definite integral than using the trapezoid method or one of its close relatives. I probably learned this in one of the many calc classes that I took all those years ago, but it was a nice revelation as I was thinking about it. Now all I need is one of those unintegrable functions so I can tackle the matter.